Skip to main content
Ask Romi
en
  • English(Current language)
  • العربية(not available for this page)
  • Русский(not available for this page)
Get Your Plan

Menu

Rehabilitation outcome

Functional Independence Measure (FIM)

The FIM is an 18-item scale scoring how much assistance a person needs across thirteen motor and five cognitive tasks. Each item is scored from 1 (total assistance) to 7 (complete independence), giving a total between 18 and 126. Scored at admission and discharge, the change is a standard measure of rehabilitation effect.

Reading time
1 min
Abbreviation
FIM
Written by
Romatem International editorial team
Last reviewed
Last updated

What it measures

The FIM measures burden of care — how much another person has to do for the patient — rather than impairment. That distinction matters: two patients with the same weakness can score very differently depending on how much help they actually need to get through a day.

It covers thirteen motor items (eating, grooming, bathing, dressing upper and lower body, toileting, bladder and bowel management, bed and chair transfers, toilet transfers, shower transfers, walking or wheelchair use, stairs) and five cognitive items (comprehension, expression, social interaction, problem solving, memory).

How it is scored

Each item is scored on a seven-point scale. A score of 1 means the patient performs less than 25% of the task themselves; 7 means complete independence with no aid, no adaptation and no unusual amount of time. Scores between indicate progressively less assistance.

The total is reported alongside the motor and cognitive subscales. Reporting only the total hides the pattern — a patient can gain substantially in motor function while cognitive scores stay flat, and a family needs to know which of the two happened.

How we use it

We score the FIM at admission and again at discharge for every inpatient. The change between the two, together with the number of days between the assessments, is the primary figure we report to patients, families and referring clinicians.

Key facts

Functional Independence Measure (FIM) — key facts
AbbreviationFIM
Number of items18
Score range18–126 total (13 motor items 13–91; 5 cognitive items 5–35)
Time to administer30–45 minutes by a credentialed assessor
Training requiredYes — formal credentialing is required for scoring consistency
CostLicensed instrument; fee applies
EquipmentNo equipment — structured observation of the patient performing the tasks
DomainsSelf-care · Sphincter control · Transfers · Locomotion · Communication · Social cognition
ICF domainActivity and participation
Age rangeAdult 18+ (WeeFIM for children)
PopulationsStroke · Traumatic brain injury · Spinal cord injury · Multiple sclerosis · Orthopaedic · Amputation
LanguagesAvailable in many languages under licence

Psychometrics by population

The same instrument behaves differently in different conditions. A cut-off established in older adults does not transfer to Parkinson's disease, and a minimal detectable change from one study does not apply to another population.

Read each value with its population: every figure below names the study or database it comes from and applies to the population that study measured. A cut-off from one population does not transfer to another.
Population-specific psychometric data
PopulationCut-offMDC / MCIDReliabilityValidity
Stroke—MCID 22 points for total FIM, 17 for motor and 3 for cognitive (Beninato 2006)High inter-rater reliability with credentialed assessorsStrong concurrent validity against the Barthel Index
Spinal cord injuryThe motor subscale is more responsive than total FIM in this population; the SCIM is often preferred————
Traumatic brain injuryCognitive subscale ceiling effects are reported in milder injury————

Things to be careful about

  • Ceiling effects limit sensitivity in higher-functioning patients
  • Requires credentialed assessors — scores from untrained raters are not comparable
  • Motor and cognitive subscales should always be reported separately, not only as a total

Forms and downloads

Functional Independence Measure (FIM) — scoring form

Scoring forms are distributed under licence and cannot be republished here. Ask your rehabilitation team for the version they use.

Availability depends on the instrument's licence.

Frequently asked questions

What is a good FIM score?

There is no single good score. The total runs from 18, where a person needs total assistance with everything, to 126, where they are completely independent. What matters clinically is the change between admission and discharge and the number of days it took, not the figure on its own — a patient who moves from 40 to 70 has gained more than one who arrives at 95 and leaves at 100.

Why is the FIM scored twice?

Once at admission and once at discharge. The difference between the two, set against the number of days between them, is the primary figure we report to patients, families and referring clinicians. A single score describes a moment; only the change describes what rehabilitation did.

Why are the motor and cognitive scores reported separately?

Because the total hides the pattern. A patient can gain substantially in motor function while cognitive scores stay flat, and a family needs to know which of the two happened — the two have very different consequences for going home. We report the 13 motor items and the 5 cognitive items alongside the total, never the total alone.

Can a FIM score from another hospital be compared with ours?

Only if both were scored by credentialed assessors. The FIM requires formal credentialing and scores from untrained raters are not comparable. If you are bringing records from another centre, tell us who performed the assessment — it changes how we read the number.

Is the FIM free to use?

No. It is a licensed instrument and a fee applies, which is one reason the freely available Barthel Index remains so widely used. Scoring forms are distributed under licence and cannot be republished here; ask your rehabilitation team for the version they use.

Sources

  1. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation — FIM instrument documentation — UDSMR (2024)
  2. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: a quantitative review — Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (1996)
  3. Beninato M, Gill-Body KM, Salles S, Stark PC, Black-Schaffer RM, Stein J. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke — Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2006)

Where to next

Talk to someone before you decide

Four ways to reach the international office, depending on where you are. Nothing here commits you to treatment — a second opinion, a video consultation and a written plan are all free, and you can start with a question.